Children Should Be Paid for Doing Chores Essay

ARGUMENTATIVE ESSAYTopic Children should be stipendiary for doing choresIt is common knowledge that household chores much(prenominal) as doing the dishes, cleaning rooms, throwing the garbage argon not really entertaining activities to the majority of people, especially to children. That is why some mentions who are totally aware of the king of the influence of funds, expect that allowance relied to chores hatful be a productive way not only to incite children to do the chores but overly to tutor them the value of money and hard shape. However, the negative influences that money can bring make parents doubt to this mode. Although some people claim that children should be paid for doing chores, it is my lean that paying them leads to slippery slope effects.Proponents of allowance relied to chores argue that this method teaches children to manage their own money. However, this is not the only way to make them acquire this notion of management. Parents can give them a monthl y pocket money separated to the chores, for instance. Suppose a little boy acquires 2500Ar of pocket money a month. If he wants to procure a 5000Ar-video game, he can ascertain either to spend it for a cheaper one or to save it and wait the next-month-pocket money to buy it. Therefore, children can manage their money else way than getting allowance for chores.Motivation through money may not work and can even be counter-productive, despite the event that pro-payment for chores claim that it motivates children to do the chores. For example, if a child decides that he/she doesnt really need a dollar today, it wont be hard for him/her to decide not to do the chores. Besides, according to psychologists researches, young children who are rewarded for drawing are less likely to draw on their own that are children who draw only if for the fun of it. In other words, if we reward children with money for doing chores, they will be less motivated to do them.Not only can this reward method demotivate children from doing chores but,it also teaches them love only for money. In fact, they can ask their parents for an allowance raise otherwise, they wont do their household tasks. Dean Mehrkens, a parent who tried the pay-per-chore-system, declared that, due to this system, his three-year-old daughter refused to do anything unless there was some kind of compensation. Furthermore, he added that it made it difficult to correct or discipline a kid for doing what wed taught him to do except payment for everything. Consequently, the more parents reward their children with money for doing chores, the more materialistic and demotivated they will be.The most famous argument that pay-per-chore parents kick out is this is a mean to make children realize they need to work hard to be well paid nevertheless, chores are all family members responsibilities and not a work at all. Actually, unless its their professions, parents are not paid for doing the chores. So, why should children b e paid while they wont be later? Besides, instead of petition their parents allowance for chores, children should be grateful towards them for being taken care of by them and do their duties for free.Thats exactly the message that Marie Lafort wanted to pass on in the lyric of her song entitled Gift Last night, while I was cooking in the kitchen, my son came in and held out a canvas of paper to me I read it. And, thats what it was saying For having done my bed the whole week 3 francs. For taking out the waste-paper basket 75 cents. For having water the flowers of the balcony 25 cents. Altogether its 9 francs and 85 centimes. So, I picket his pencil, I returned the sheet and thats what I wrote For nine months of patience and twelve hours of suffering, its free. For so many sleepless nights, watching your sleep, its free. For rides, toys, and school its free. And if we have a look at it, the total of my love is totally free. We also have to take into consideration that children ca n have extra-work activities so as to make them understand this work ethic. Besides, most financial and child-development experts agree that paying children for extra-jobs that are outside their normal set of chores is a good idea. They can, for instance, mow the lawn, feed their neighbors pets and sell cakes, cookies, and lemonades. Thus, if they want their children to get this work ethic, parents should incite them to do extra-jobs.It is evident that money has nothing to do with chores which are family duties. It overshadows the good reasons for doing household tasks. Indeed, when children do chores, they receive a sense of accomplishment, pride and increased self-confidence for a job well-done. sometimes they also want to please their parents. As a consequence, putting a monetary value on chores eclipses all of those benefits. In other words, they will suffer to work for allowances instead of their parents praise. Besides, not only does payment can cause childrens discouragement for doing chores, but it can also make them more materialistic. Finally, as parents are not even paid for doing chores and are already in charge of their children as well, the latter should thank their parents by doing the chores without payment. Thus, instead of chores allowances, kids can get pocket money, or do extra-jobs to understand work ethic and money management. Thats why I firmly believe that children should not be paid for doing chores.