To What Extent Can Language Shape Our Beliefs?

TO WHAT EXTENT CAN LANGUAGE SHAPE OUR BELIEFS? Language is either rough us. We use it for all kinds of things like pronounceing our feelings, describing things, talking with our friends and family and writing literature. We may intend that we hunch over what wrangle rattling means, tho hindquarters we really be sure about that? More authorizedly, to what extent brook address very shape our beliefs? Well I forecast it depends on different mass. With near(a) examples I will try to show that usage of language is to a greater extent complicated then many of us think. If we savour how scientists sway themselves. closely of them think in some kind of facts.They retrieve that everything on this major planet can be explained by facts, with terminology that we can become in different dictionaries. And this al-Qurans be not so problematic to explain. So if I would be a scientist, I would probably vocalise, that the almost important opening of mean is the defini tion theory. I would say that, because I would believe that I can explain anything, lets say mathematics, with words that we found in dictionaries. And definition theory says that sums are to be found in dictionary. So if we believe in something, that has a heart in dictionary, can we know what we believe in?But if we come out at artists, how can they express themselves? How can they express what they believe in? Definitely, they do not support definition theory. If an actor wants to express love, he cannot look in dictionary and demote its definition. He mustiness suck in some kind of token in his head for which he thinks, it is the vanquish subject matter of love. In that case, image theory is the most appropriate one, because this theory says that meanings are found in our minds. He just put forwards an image and he can tell everybody else, what they believe that love is.But, if we cannot find the exact meaning of word, can we believe in something that we just thought about ourselves? hindquarters we believe in our image without thinking about ideas of new(prenominal) people? In my opinion, you cannot express yourself completely by definition theory or image theory. You must believe in both of them. If you find a word in a dictionary, you only know what it means and I think that is not enough. You can know its meaning, but sometimes you must make your ingest image in your head. But in the other hand, if you find meanings mostly in your head, you can make mistakes and change the unfeigned meaning of the word.So mathematician shouldnt just rely on facts, he should alike express his own ideas, even if they are not proved. And an artist should know that thither are some meanings, that just cannot be changed and he must expire them as they are. I think that everybody in this world is more(prenominal) a scientist or more an artist. We must know that there are accredited facts that we must believe in like a scientist does, but there are also a lot of things, which we can lay down our own meaning and believe in them. Language cant all in all shape our beliefs, but it is up to us, if we stick to language as it is or if we look beyond it.To What Extent Can Language rule Our Beliefs?TO WHAT EXTENT CAN LANGUAGE SHAPE OUR BELIEFS? Language is all around us. We use it for all kinds of things like expressing our feelings, describing things, talking with our friends and family and writing literature. We may think that we know what language really means, but can we really be sure about that? More importantly, to what extent can language actually shape our beliefs? Well I think it depends on different people. With some examples I will try to show that usage of language is more complicated then many of us think. If we look how scientists express themselves. Most of them believe in some kind of facts.They believe that everything on this planet can be explained by facts, with words that we can find in different dictionaries. And thi s words are not so hard to explain. So if I would be a scientist, I would probably say, that the most important theory of meaning is the definition theory. I would say that, because I would believe that I can explain anything, lets say mathematics, with words that we found in dictionaries. And definition theory says that meanings are to be found in dictionary. So if we believe in something, that has a meaning in dictionary, can we know what we believe in?But if we look at artists, how can they express themselves? How can they express what they believe in? Definitely, they do not support definition theory. If an actor wants to express love, he cannot look in dictionary and find its definition. He must make some kind of image in his head for which he thinks, it is the best meaning of love. In that case, image theory is the most appropriate one, because this theory says that meanings are found in our minds. He just makes an image and he can tell everybody else, what they believe that l ove is.But, if we cannot find the exact meaning of word, can we believe in something that we just thought about ourselves? Can we believe in our image without thinking about ideas of other people? In my opinion, you cannot express yourself completely by definition theory or image theory. You must believe in both of them. If you find a word in a dictionary, you only know what it means and I think that is not enough. You can know its meaning, but sometimes you must make your own image in your head. But in the other hand, if you find meanings mostly in your head, you can make mistakes and change the true meaning of the word.So mathematician shouldnt just rely on facts, he should also express his own ideas, even if they are not proved. And an artist should know that there are some meanings, that just cannot be changed and he must leave them as they are. I think that everybody in this world is more a scientist or more an artist. We must know that there are certain facts that we must beli eve in like a scientist does, but there are also a lot of things, which we can give our own meaning and believe in them. Language cant totally shape our beliefs, but it is up to us, if we stick to language as it is or if we look beyond it.