Discuss the Influence of Childhood on Adult Relationships

Discuss the twist of churlhood on big(a) bloods. (24 Marks) Many chemical bond psychologists argue that earlier relationships with our primary thrillgivers come through the foundation for later big(p) relationships. Bowlby called this the continuity hypothesis. This is the make that early relationship effs continue in later adult relationships. jibe to the hamper theory, young children produce an internal operative model from their first relationship with their primary cargonr.This is then the basis on which they consider what is acceptable in future day relationships and whether they are able to trust or rely some other(a) exclusives (based on preconceptions from previous relationships). Young children also develop characteristic bail styles in their early relationships which influence later relationships by providing the child with beliefs nigh themselves, other people and relationships in general. There are several attachment styles that a child can develop in infancy.Ainsworth (1971) divided these into secure, insecure-avoidant and insecure-resistant, when work on her Strange Situation research. The characteristics we associate with attachment styles will provide a child with a set of beliefs about themselves and the nature of relationships with others. These attachment styles can be seen as a indicator of the nature of their future adult relationships. For example, someone who is securely attached as a child can expect to concur similar relationships throughout life.There is research documentation the influence of childhood on adult relationship, such as the longitudinal study performed by Simpson et al (2007). It was carried out on on a group of individuals from childhood into their twenties. Individuals previously labelled as securely attached were to a greater extent capable of socialising, developed secure friendships and had positive emotional experiences on a regular basis, supporting the hypothesis. This shows that our attach ment as children, and our developed internal working model influence our adult relationships greatly.Another study that proves this hypothesis was performed by precentor and S stirr (1981). They devised a love quiz in a topical anaesthetic newspaper, asking readers to describe their feelings and experiences about romantic relationships and their childhood relationships with parents. They found a strong correlation between childhood and adult relationship patterns for example, insecure-avoidant types doubted the cosmea of love, feared virtuallyness and found it hard to forgive insecure-resistant types were intensely emotional, jealous and shady and secure types believed in love, were very trusting and liked being close to others.However it is unlikely that our attachment types as children are fixed. Life events, such as divorce of parents or loss of a loved one, can suffer a securely attached child to become insecure, therefore it is un realisticistic to feel out that our earl y relationships determine whether or not we watch successful long-lived relationships. Also, this is a very deterministic view. It paint a pictures that we have no control everywhere the effect our childhood has on our future and that we do not have free will. For example the idea that because a child was abused, when they grow up they will become abusers is not only is this untrue, but it plays on the idea that we have no power over who we become. ) Relationships with peers also have an influence on later adult relationships. Peers become more influential as a child progresses into adolescence, playing a significant role in an individual becoming an independent adult, and helping to develop social skills, including those needed for adult relationships.As young people develop into adolescents, they spend less period with parents and family and time with peers increases. They are more likely to experience self disclosure of intragroup feelings and secrets. Bee (1995) argues tha t teenagers use their peer group to make the transition from protection from the family to the real world. Interactions help to develop independence where the teen gradually attains separation from their family. This suggests how they develop a level of emotional and physical intimacy different to that to which they have with their parents.However gender differences have been found in childhood relationships. Research has shown that girls experience more intimate peer relations than boys, and often report feelings of care and security in their relationships with other girls. In contrast, boys peer relationships are commonly more competitive. Therefore, we cannot generalise about the effects of childhood peer interactions as experiences are often very different. Also, umteen studies of adolescent relationships have relied on small samples from once school or city, usually in the US.A major(ip) disadvantage of such samples is that it doesnt adequately represent relationships in othe r areas and cultures. Therefore, it is difficult to generalise findings, especially to non-Western cultures. Overall there are many suggestions as to how childhood, (the effects of peer relationships and parent-child relationships,) can affect our future adult relationships, and although there is various evidence supporting this, it is too reductionist to suggest that childhood experiences is the only factor that impacts possible relationships, as there are others such as life events and environmental factors.